In 1789 French parliamentarians attending their National Assembly gravitated to one side or other of the Assembly President; those who sat to his right sought to defend the king and the established hierarchy; those to his left supported the French Revolution and further reform. Over the ensuing decades, the seating arrangement took root. “Left” and “right”, initially used as insults, became shorthand for political positions all around the world.
In today’s UK parliament, the old left–right division is more apparent than it has been for years, although the monarchy is no longer one of the major bones of contention (despite a certain TV interview). The two main political parties have now published their manifestos and they project very different visions of the UK’s future.
Yet each, in its way, also conjures the past. The Conservative manifesto argues that “we led the way in opening up trade in manufactured goods in the last two centuries”; it goes on “for the first time in nearly half a century, the UK will have its own independent trade policy once we leave the EU”. Labour’s main historical focus is the post-war Attlee government of 1945: indeed, it repeats word-for-word a manifesto promise on housebuilding from that same year.
Despite their eye-catching differences, both parties now wish to spend. This is perhaps understandable, given the OECD last week pushed for G20 governments to open the spigots, and that the latest Bank of England analysis suggests investment is needed in the UK. (The latter, however, argues that business will begin to provide it once Brexit uncertainty is ended.) But the difference between Tory and Labour spending plans is, of course, enormous.
Johnson and Corbyn delivered their respective visions to a somewhat sceptical CBI last week. The prime minister had made enemies with his hostile comments about UK business last year, but Jeremy Corbyn probably fared worse, as his audience was unnerved by such pledges as the nationalisation of utilities, a financial transactions tax and putting workers on boards.
Markets offered their own assessment; polls showed Labour falling to some 15%-17% behind the Conservatives in the polls – and sterling rose to its highest level in two weeks.
A strong sterling tends to weigh on the FTSE 100, but equities worldwide are generally in rally mode at the moment on 2020 growth and trade hopes. On trade, more positive noises from both sides of the US–China, Japan–South Korea and UK–EU trade negotiations boosted sentiment. Meanwhile, volatility has been exceptionally low; many investors, it seems, spy opportunities.
“The global economy has struggled to grow coming out of the financial crisis, central bank intervention has driven interest rates negative in many cases, and you have the industrial revolution of our age – the technological revolution,” said Dan O’Keefe of Artisan Partners, co-manager of the St. James’s Place Global fund. “All three factors have driven investors to companies they believe can grow in any environment.”
Stocks slipped in the back half of last week, however, after the US Senate passed a bill that would oblige the White House to reconsider Hong Kong’s special status on an annual basis – a shot across the bows of US-China rapprochement. The S&P 500, China’s CSI and the EURO STOXX 50 all fell. Earnings last week were mixed: some good news for US retailers (such as Lowe’s), but bad news for some global names (like Kingfisher). The sharp dip in EasyJet’s earnings was smaller than expected, pushing up the share price; the recent demise of Thomas Cook was given as one of the reasons, since it freed up airport slots. Meanwhile, in Asia, Alibaba raised $11 billion in its second listing – this time in Hong Kong.
The city continued to be a global flashpoint last week, as a court ruling angered the mainland. Local elections, of little practical importance, suggested Beijing is also failing to win its PR war in the city; and pushed up Hong Kong stocks in early trading this morning.
The People’s Bank of China, meanwhile, chose last week to cut rates for the first time in four years, signalling the advent of a new easing cycle. More importantly for China, however, data showed that capital is increasingly flowing from dollar to renminbi assets, and that consumption in China is on the rise. The shift suggests global investors are finding more and more opportunities in the country.
“In China, the two areas we’re interested in are the internet and healthcare,” said Mark Baribeau of Jennison Associates, manager of the St. James’ Place Global Emerging Markets fund. “We’ve increased our exposure to companies like Alibaba which are doing very well even in a tough environment; continuing to gain market share. And China’s healthcare system is way behind where it needs to be to satisfy the needs of the country, so they’re investing heavily in building their own life sciences industry.”
FSSA and Jennison are fund managers for St. James’s Place.
The information contained is correct as at the date of the article. The information contained does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to state, indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future results or expectations. Where the opinions of third parties are offered, these may not necessarily reflect those of St. James’s Place.
FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2019. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under licence. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.
© S&P Dow Jones LLC 2019; all rights reserved